Amid ongoing tensions with India, the International Monetary Fund (IMF) has approved a $1 billion bailout package for Pakistan. Despite strong opposition, India was unable to vote against the funding. India cited Pakistan’s poor track record in using previous financial aid responsibly and raised concerns over the misuse of IMF funds.
During the IMF board meeting held in Washington on May 9, India expressed its concern over Pakistan’s repeated failure to meet the conditions tied to previous IMF support. Referring to the IMF’s own report, India highlighted that political considerations have played a significant role in IMF’s decision-making regarding Pakistan. The report also noted that continued bailouts have pushed Pakistan into a deep debt trap, essentially turning it into a “massive defaulter” for the IMF.
India also questioned how the financial aid provided to Pakistan is being used. It alleged that the funds indirectly support Pakistan’s military and terrorist groups. India accused Pakistan of using IMF money to support extremist organisations like Lashkar-e-Taiba and Jaish-e-Mohammed, which carry out attacks on Indian soil.
Why Couldn’t India Vote Against Pakistan’s Funding?
At the IMF, decisions are typically made by consensus. Even when votes are cast, there is no option to vote “No” or reject a proposal. Member countries can either vote in favour or abstain. Although India openly opposed the bailout, under IMF rules, it could only abstain from voting. Additionally, India had recalled its Executive Director at the IMF, Krishnamurthy Subramanian, six months before his term ended, which meant India currently had no voting representative at the IMF.
Also Read- War-like Situation Between India and Pakistan: Decision on IPL 2025 to Be Made Today
Pakistan’s Economy Heavily Dependent on IMF
Pakistan’s struggling economy is heavily reliant on IMF assistance. India’s decision to stay away from the voting process is being seen as a message to the IMF and other multilateral financial institutions — that offering financial aid to Pakistan without demanding strong reforms could pose a risk to regional security.